The Equivalence between Form and Function of the Explanatory Modal Particle Noda Meaning 'Conclusion' in the novel Laskar Pelangi

Authors

  • Hana Nimashita Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • Suhandono Universitas Gadjah Mada Author
  • Tatang Hariri Universitas Gadjah Mada Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v6i2.580

Keywords:

conjunction, modality of explanation noda, subjectivity, textual equivalence

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the occurrence of the Japanese linguistic feature known as noda which conveys the meaning of 'conclusion' in the novel Niji no Shounentachi (the Japanese translation of the novel Laskar Pelangi). The focus of this study is to explain the functional background of Indonesian language forms that can be equated with noda in the sense of 'conclusion'. The data in this study consist of narrative sentences containing noda that express ‘conclusion’ and narrative sentences in the source text that express ‘conclusion’ in textual form (possessing linguistic markers). The main theories used in this study are the explanatory modality of noda proposed by Masuoka. Liu on the function of noda in discourse, and the theory of textual equivalence by Baker. This study identified several linguistic forms that can be equated with the use of noda signifying ‘conclusion,’ namely the conjunctions 'maka' and 'sehingga', the pronoun 'demikian', the phrases dengan 'demikian' and 'oleh karena itu', and the adjective 'baru'. Based on these findings, the function of noda in this study explains the indirect relationship between the explanatory element (Q), which takes the form of the author’s subjective attitude regarding the element being explained in the context (P).

References

Alfarina, L., & Hartono, R. (2025). Grammatical Accuracy in Translating Direct Speech: A Comparison between Professionals and EFL Students. Allure Journal, 5(2), 201–209.

Avatara, B., Karima, F. H., Kustantinah, I., & Vatsiniaina, A. H. (2024). Social Inequality in the Movie Fantastic Mr. Fox. Allure Journal, 4(2), 117–126.

Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge.

Chaer, A. (2015). Sintaksis Bahasa Indonesia: Pendekatan Proses. Rineka Cipta.

Cook, H. M. (1990). An indexical account of the Japanese sentence-final particle no. Discourse Processes, 13(4), 401–439.

Cruchinho, P., López-Franco, M. D., Capelas, M. L., Almeida, S., Bennett, P. M., da Silva, M. M., Teixeira, G., Nunes, E., Lucas, P., & Gaspar, F. (2024). Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 2701–2728. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S419714

Deilen, S., Lapshinova-Koltunski, E., & Carl, M. (2023). Cognitive aspects of compound translation: Insights into the relation between implicitation and cognitive effort from a translation process perspective. Ampersand, 11.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman Group.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar.

Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of model verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/ 3587627

Hirata, A. (2005). Laskar pelangi. Bentang Pustaka.

Huang, Y., & Li, D. (2023). Translatorial voice through modal stance: A corpus-based study of modality shifts in Chinese-to-English translation of research article abstracts. Lingua, 295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103610

Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford university press.

Isao, I. (2026). Continuity And Discontinuity Between Demonstratives And Conjunctions In Japanese. Hitotsubashi Journal of Arts and Sciences, 66, 14–31.

Kamio, A. (1997). Territory of information. John Benjamins Publishing.

Kaneko, Y. (2018). Asupekuto no kankyuu to modariti no noutan: Noda-bun wo meguru nichi-ro taishou kenkyuu [Aspectual rhythm and modal gradation: A comparative Japanese-Russian study on the noda construction]. Koubeshi Gaikokugo Daigaku Kenkyuukai, 69(1).

Kang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Socio-cognitive influences on translating forward causal connectives: A multivariate analysis of English translations of Tao Te Ching. Lingua, 314.

Kato, H., & Fukutake, S. (2013). Niji no Shounentachi. (Terjemahan Laskar Pelangi). Sanmaaku Shuppan.

Larson, M. L. (1984). Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. University Press of America.

Lin, X. (2016). Noda no setsumei modariti youhou ni kansuru kousatsu kiteisei no kanten kara (A Study on the Explanation Usage of “Noda”: From the Perspective of Anaphoricity). In Journal Jinbun kaisha kagaku kenkyuu. Chiba University.

Liu, X. (2008). The discourse functions of the modal auxiliaries wake da and no da in Japanese. Lincom Europa.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Two volume). Cambridge University Press.

Masuoka, T. (1991). Modariti Bunpoo (Tata Bahasa Modalitas). Kuroshio.

Maynard, S. K. (1992). Cognitive and pragmatic messages of a syntactic choice: The case of the Japanese commentary predicate n (o) da. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 12(4), 563–614.

Miyazaki, K., Adachi, T., Noda, H., & Takanashi, S. (2002). Modariti (Modalitas). Kuroshio.

Moeliono, A. M., Lapoliwa, H., Alwi, H., & Sasangka, S. S. T. W. (2017). Tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Keem). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revi). PT remaja rosdakarya.

Narrog, H. (2009). Modality in Japanese. John Benjamins Publishing.

Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1974). The theory and practice of translation. E. J. Brill.

Nishi, H. (2023). Japanese no datta and no de atta in written discourse. Pragmatics, 33(2), 260–284.

Nitta, Y. (2003). Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo 4 Modariti. Kuroshio.

Nitta, Y. (2009). Nihon no Modariti to Sono Shuuhen [Japanese Modality and Their Surroundings]. Hitsuji Shobou.

Noda, H. (1997). No (da) no Kinoo (Function of no (da)). Kuroshio.

Oshima, D. Y. (2024). On the mirative use of the no (da) construction in Japanese. In I. E. M. & H. N. (Eds.) (Ed.), Discourse Particles in Asian Languages. Routledge.

Sajarwa. (2021). Metode penelitian bahasa. In Metode penelitian penerjemahan (pp. 106–108). Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Su, H. (2025). Critical thinking-embedded EFL translation instruction and its impact on EFL translation learners. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57.

Takatsu, T. (1991). A unified semantic analysis of the NO DA construction in Japanese. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 25(2), 167–176.

Tanaka, N. (1980). Nihongo to Nihongo Kyouiku (Vol. 8). Pusat Internasional Universitas Keio.

Wang, X. (2023). Noda koubun ni taiou suru outai suru chuugokugo no hyougen kaki kotoba no chousha o chuushin ni [Chinese expressions corresponding to the “noda” construction: Focusing on written language research]. Hitotsubashi University.

Yoshida, S. (1988). Noda keishiki no kouzou to hyougen kouka [The structure and expressive effects of the noda form]. Kobe Daigaku Kokugo Ronso, 15.

Yu, H., & Wang, N. (2023). What happened to the modal expressions? Modality in translating Chinese texts into English. Lingua, 294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103606

Zufferey, S. (2016). Discourse connectives across languages: Factors influencing their explicit or implicit translation. International Journal for Contrastive Linguistics, 16(2), 264–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.2.05zuf

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles